Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : acemd 6.53
Author | Message |
---|---|
What is up with this new applciation. cputime - credit claim - granted - version - driver - cpus - client - gpu time - ms/step 51,765.08 3,232.06 3,232.06 6.53 178.24 1.90 6.4.02 62,292.532 73.285 51,160.42 3,232.06 3,232.06 6.53 178.24 1.90 6.4.02 62,612.755 73.662 52,259.07 3,232.06 3,232.06 6.53 178.24 1.90 6.4.02 63,227.636 74.385 49,119.95 3,232.06 3,232.06 6.52 178.24 1.90 6.4.02 59,451.948 69.943 49,250.64 3,232.06 3,232.06 6.52 178.24 1.90 6.4.02 59,452.824 69.944 48,724.11 3,232.06 3,232.06 6.52 178.24 1.90 6.4.02 59,492.902 69.992 48,458.51 3,232.06 3,232.06 6.52 178.24 1.90 6.4.02 59,268.219 69.727 48,364.13 3,232.06 3,232.06 6.52 178.24 1.90 6.4.02 59,162.575 69.603 49,230.23 3,232.06 3,232.06 6.52 178.24 1.90 6.4.02 59,228.002 69.680 49,079.31 3,232.06 3,232.06 6.52 178.24 1.90 6.4.02 59,123.869 69.557 49,090.84 3,232.06 3,232.06 6.52 178.24 1.90 6.4.02 59,325.965 69.795 48,103.39 3,232.06 3,232.06 6.52 178.24 1.90 6.4.02 59,306.325 69.772 49,156.69 3,232.06 3,232.06 6.52 178.24 1.90 6.4.02 59,354.071 69.828 49,170.42 3,232.06 3,232.06 6.52 178.24 1.90 6.4.02 59,486.919 69.985 49,379.95 3,232.06 3,232.06 6.52 178.24 1.90 6.4.02 59,273.031 69.733 ____________ Alpha Tester ~~ BOINCin since 10-Apr-2004 (2.28) ~~~ Join team USA | |
ID: 4309 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
My last 2 workunits (shorter WU) are ca. 30% shorter and I get only 2435.94444444444 credits for it. Now I have oftener to make a manually update to get new work (24 hour recall problem). | |
ID: 4310 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
You have to look at the workunit name. Otherwise it is normal that the workunit time changes. Different workunits can have different time per step, different total times and therefore different credits. | |
ID: 4312 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We will check. There should be only minor differences with previous application. | |
ID: 4313 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
My last 2 workunits (shorter WU) are ca. 30% shorter and I get only 2435.94444444444 credits for it. Now I have oftener to make a manually update to get new work (24 hour recall problem). 1. I had exactly the same (lenght of WU). But for me it`s not a problem. 2. The problem is that app 6.53 said that my WU`s will take over 78h (sure it`s not true - GTX280 OC). It means what`s in follow: on the maschine with 2x280GTX I have 3 WU`s (2 in use) and BM will not request more (the 4th one WU). BM will not request more cause it means for BM that I`ll can`t finish in time. It means that after finishing 2 of 3 WU`s one of my 280 will be idle. Just for now I`ve changed `Resource share` on every maschines up to 1000 to get work. Hope it will work until problem will be solved (6.54?) As always - sorry for bad english ;) ____________ | |
ID: 4316 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
You have to look at the workunit name. Otherwise it is normal that the workunit time changes. Different workunits can have different time per step, different total times and therefore different credits. Looking at the names, they were the same group TEST5 except one TEST6. The INCREASE in ms/step was when the app version changed from 6.52 to 6.53, same task group names. Only the last one on the list is a TEST6 and that shows the same ms/step under 6.53 as the TEST5 under 6.53 (the top three on my list). With 6.53 these are showing 73-74 ms/step. Prior to that I had over 30 results with 6.52 all in the 69 ms/step range. And the last one completed is same way, increase ms/step. 161682 Name WLX3978-GPUTEST6-1-20-acemd_0 Workunit 120384 Created 13 Dec 2008 13:57:38 UTC Sent 13 Dec 2008 19:02:36 UTC Received 14 Dec 2008 14:07:56 UTC Server state Over Outcome Success Client state Done Exit status 0 (0x0) Computer ID 6577 Report deadline 17 Dec 2008 19:02:36 UTC CPU time 51465.75 stderr out <core_client_version>6.4.2</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> # Using CUDA device 0 # Device 0: "GeForce 8800 GT" # Clock rate: 1512000 kilohertz # Number of multiprocessors: 14 # Number of cores: 112 MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor" # Time per step: 73.314 ms # Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 62317.270 s called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> Validate state Valid Claimed credit 3232.06365740741 Granted credit 3232.06365740741 application version 6.53 | |
ID: 4326 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Bad english is the language of the science ... ;) But your english is much better then mine ... :D ____________ | |
ID: 4333 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
6.53 - time per step = 131 ms, overall 65550 sec per wu, credit 2435. | |
ID: 4339 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We will soon upload new Linux and Windows applications. | |
ID: 4342 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
We will soon upload new Linux and Windows applications. I hope it will help :) because:
It doesn`t help 100%. After rising up `Resource share` to 1000 I get manually 1 more task (the 4th one) and I went sleep. When I awake I checked my box - 2x280 has finished those 4 WU`s and didn`t request more... Box was idle. Nice 24C ;) ____________ | |
ID: 4345 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
This is not an application problem. We are trying to normalize the estimated time. A project reset should solve the problem. | |
ID: 4347 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi GDF - ran a project reset on one of my boxes. Doesn't solve the (my) problem - in fact it makes it worse. Estimated run times had come down to the 100's, but after a rest WUs were showing 299 hours to completion. I'm still managing the work manually - and these shorter wWUs in fact make things harder to stop my hosts sitting idle. | |
ID: 4352 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I try to reset the project, correct the DCF, but nothing correct the problem. | |
ID: 4356 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I reverted to 6.4.3 on the main page. | |
ID: 4357 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It doesn`t work. Reseting project is making the situation worse as Burdett have written. Estimated time 201 hours. One of my computers (with 280GTX) downloaded just one WU and will not take more. Because of `ETA`. I reverted to 6.4.3 on the main page. Just for ur knowledge. I`m using 6.3.19 and 6.3.21 (I don`t trust this new s***). One is x32 and another x64. Going back to 6.4.3 could not solve problem. ____________ | |
ID: 4364 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I further on use the 6.4.5. When I get a WU of the bad lot (this with another name that GPUTEST5 or GPUTEST6), I know, my DCF will be messed up. So I edit the DCF back to 1.00000 and then I get new work. I have on every box with this method 3 or 4 WUs. | |
ID: 4369 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
@GDF (here we started, here I`ll continue): | |
ID: 4461 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Something's screwy - GPUGrid no longer functions as a project that works without a biological coprocessor (me). | |
ID: 4463 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
HI, | |
ID: 4464 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Try to update the BOINC client to 6.4.3 please. | |
ID: 4465 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
............. 6.4.3 now on host 17415. I'm afraid to say it has made no difference; first attempt to gain work has resulted in the 24 hour backoff. | |
ID: 4468 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Try to update the BOINC client to 6.4.3 please. Doesn't appear to work. Gets the 24-hour backoff. If I try to suspend other projects, I get the no work available for your processor message. | |
ID: 4480 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
......... GDF - I guess 6.4.3 was a typo as elsewhere you are advocating 6.4.2. | |
ID: 4484 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Yes, it was a typo. | |
ID: 4495 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : acemd 6.53