Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : 285s?
Author | Message |
---|---|
I have a couple GTX285's lying around.. Are they still viable for computing or have they officially become trash? | |
ID: 33127 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
My OC 285gtx needed last time around 33hours per long unit (dont know what author it was). But because the short units are paying for the same time lesser credits its still worth running it, when you dont fear the W/credit ;) When you dont run 24/7 then i would change it to short queue because deadlinealert. It needs then around 9 hours or so. dont know exactly. | |
ID: 33129 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have a couple GTX285's lying around.. Are they still viable for computing or have they officially become trash? See the corresponding FAQ. I don't recommend to use it for 24/7 crunching, as if you do, you will pay the price of a better card for electricity costs in a short time. | |
ID: 33130 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
A GTX 650 Ti would get about the same credits as two GTX285's combined, but would use 200W less power. | |
ID: 33141 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Agreed - it really depends on your electricity cost. If it's very low you could still run them for some time. And you could use them for POEM, running 3 - 4 WUs per GPU. There the obviously still consume more power than modern cards, but should still be able to achieve ~500k RAC with a Quad Core host and PCIe 2. That's half as fast as top end cards, i.e. still pretty good. The reason why the old cardss are still doing so well is because they're limited by PCIe 3 over there (which is really unusual). | |
ID: 33147 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Great responses guys thanks.. I'll dump the 285 and get something that makes more sense and does a better job.. | |
ID: 33223 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : 285s?