Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Error units PAOLA
Author | Message |
---|---|
For three days, all units go to error (paola), where does the problem? I specify that the units (IBUCH) calculated without problems! | |
ID: 26214 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Ah im not the only one with this problem ^^ is it only with app 42 like me? | |
ID: 26216 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi, yes, cuda 42 PAOLA. My graphics card is compatible with CUDA 4.2, I do not understand? | |
ID: 26218 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I've checked the error message of these 2HDQ_43_9-PAOLA_2HDQ workunits in their stderr outpuf file, and I've find out that every one of them on every host I've checked resulted in ERROR: Failed to parse input file. So I've came to the conclusion that the source of this error is not on your side. This batch of 2HDQ_43_9-PAOLA_2HDQ workunits are messed up somehow. | |
ID: 26219 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Oh okay, thank you for your answer! | |
ID: 26220 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
it looks like it arranges, I have a unit (PAOLA) that runs without error for 27 minutes. | |
ID: 26221 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
it looks like it arranges, I have a unit (PAOLA) that runs without error for 27 minutes. This workunit comes from a different batch: 3EKO_8_10-PAOLA_3EKO_8LIGs | |
ID: 26222 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
There's definitely problems with the PAOLA_2HDQ batch. These tasks all fail on all cards no matter which app is used (3.1 or 4.2). Fortunately they all fail after a few seconds:
<core_client_version>7.0.24</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 98 (0x62, -158) </message> <stderr_txt> ERROR: file mdsim.cpp line 167: Failed to parse input file 20:12:31 (5458): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]>
| |
ID: 26228 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hi dear volunteers, | |
ID: 26245 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
This is not a parse file error, but this WU has failed on 2 other rigs. One was with 295 so maybe their end, but the other was with a 470 301.42 driver. | |
ID: 26269 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
There are still so much errors that wasting energy on resent failed workunits :( | |
ID: 26307 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Gotta take the good with the bad. This is the only WU that has crashed for me. | |
ID: 26308 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Agreed to take the bad with the good. Just had a 1E2I fail after 7 hours. I get occassional driver crashes and permanently frozen displays with the 4.2's. All 4.2's seem 'touch and go' regardless of the author. Any further refinements would be much appreciated. | |
ID: 26316 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Try this post or this post, among others, in the "FAQ - Why does my run fail? Some answers." | |
ID: 26317 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I have error with new PAOLA units "1H46 RNP" ? | |
ID: 26517 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I had 1H46_19_9-PAOLA_1H46_RNP-6-100-RND5172_1 fail with | |
ID: 26557 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Hello, Stderr output All this units are using cuda42. The only cuda31 unit I got was going fine until I've done a mistake, using the gpu at the same time. My card is a GTX260, on a freshly installed fedora 17 system, with NVIDIA driver 304.32 and cuda Toolkit 4.2.9. I have followed the procedure at http://doc.fedora-fr.org/wiki/Cuda. The GTK toolkit is working fine and primegrid also. What are this errors due to ? Thank you for your help | |
ID: 26616 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
200 series cards do not work with cuda 4.2 tasks under Linux! | |
ID: 26618 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Ok, thanks for the answer. It this case is there a way to have only cuda31 units ? | |
ID: 26619 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Use an older driver, to prevent getting the CUDA4.2 app: | |
ID: 26623 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Thanks for the advice, I will try this. Is it the same with all cuda42 applications or specific to this project ? I know that GTX 2XX are only 1.3 capable but I thought it was backward compatible | |
ID: 26631 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
It's only this project. In principle it's backwards compatible, but GPU-Grid is facing some bug in the new app, probalby in some nVidia library, which only affects the older cards. | |
ID: 26693 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : Error units PAOLA