Author |
Message |
STE\/ESend message
Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 368 Credit: 4,173,502,885 RAC: 268,909 Level
![Arginine - More than 3B credits Arg](img/badges/aa/badge_arg.png) Scientific publications
![Top 90% (223rd/251) contribution to De Fabritiis et al, Proteins 2008 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_bronze.png) ![Top 1% (2nd/2932) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (4th/2466) contribution to Sadiq et al, Proteins 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (14th/3118) contribution to Selent et al, PLoS Comput Biol 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (83rd/9662) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (38th/5798) contribution to Sadiq et al, PNAS 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (22nd/3349) contribution to Buch et al, JCIM 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (171st/3864) contribution to Dainese et al, Biochem. J. 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (14th/2163) contribution to Bisignano et al. JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 25% (525th/2838) contribution to Stanley et al, Nat Commun 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 1% (10th/3183) contribution to Lauro et al., JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 75% (4546th/6232) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, JCIM 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) |
Noticed I've been geting a lot of Errors on my i7 the last 2 day's, it was running good up until then so I'm not srue if it's the Computer or the Wu's causing the Errors.
Name p10000-IBUCH_pYIpYV_1406-5-10-RND8554_1
Workunit 550695
Created 19 Jun 2009 11:47:45 UTC
Sent 19 Jun 2009 11:49:17 UTC
Received 19 Jun 2009 23:35:10 UTC
Server state Over
Outcome Client error
Client state Compute error
Exit status 98 (0x62)
Computer ID 15842
Report deadline 24 Jun 2009 11:49:17 UTC
CPU time 2088.641
stderr out <core_client_version>6.5.0</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
- exit code 98 (0x62)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
# Using CUDA device 3
# Device 0: "GeForce GTX 295"
# Clock rate: 1512000 kilohertz
# Total amount of global memory: 939261952 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 30
# Number of cores: 240
# Device 1: "GeForce GTX 295"
# Clock rate: 1512000 kilohertz
# Total amount of global memory: 939196416 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 30
# Number of cores: 240
# Device 2: "GeForce GTX 280"
# Clock rate: 1404000 kilohertz
# Total amount of global memory: 1073479680 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 30
# Number of cores: 240
# Device 3: "GeForce GTX 260"
# Clock rate: 799200 kilohertz
# Total amount of global memory: 939261952 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 27
# Number of cores: 216
MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor"
ERROR: c:\cygwin\home\speechserver\gpumd2\src\pme\CPME_cufft.cu, line 11: cufftExecR2C (gridcalc1)
called boinc_finish
</stderr_txt>
]]>
Validate state Invalid
Claimed credit 3908.76967592593
Granted credit 0
application version 6.64
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
Looks like a problem with your gtx260
Bob |
|
|
STE\/ESend message
Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 368 Credit: 4,173,502,885 RAC: 268,909 Level
![Arginine - More than 3B credits Arg](img/badges/aa/badge_arg.png) Scientific publications
![Top 90% (223rd/251) contribution to De Fabritiis et al, Proteins 2008 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_bronze.png) ![Top 1% (2nd/2932) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (4th/2466) contribution to Sadiq et al, Proteins 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (14th/3118) contribution to Selent et al, PLoS Comput Biol 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (83rd/9662) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (38th/5798) contribution to Sadiq et al, PNAS 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (22nd/3349) contribution to Buch et al, JCIM 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (171st/3864) contribution to Dainese et al, Biochem. J. 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (14th/2163) contribution to Bisignano et al. JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 25% (525th/2838) contribution to Stanley et al, Nat Commun 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 1% (10th/3183) contribution to Lauro et al., JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 75% (4546th/6232) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, JCIM 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) |
Looks like a problem with your gtx260
Bob
How did you come to that conclusion ???
If your looking @ the Clock Rate for the 260 it's low because it's not in an X2 Slot. |
|
|
|
On your current last 2 result pages I see 9 errors which occurred while running on the GTX 260 (usually Cuda device 3), whereas only one complete and one partial WU were crunched successfully by this card. The remaining errors are related to the oversize WUs, so none to assign to the other cards.
That doesn't have to mean it's broken.. I'd check it on a different PC, preferrably with less other GPUs. could also be that the 2D settings are somehow messed up, e.g. voltage or fan speed too low due to whatever reason.
MrS
____________
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
|
|
STE\/ESend message
Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 368 Credit: 4,173,502,885 RAC: 268,909 Level
![Arginine - More than 3B credits Arg](img/badges/aa/badge_arg.png) Scientific publications
![Top 90% (223rd/251) contribution to De Fabritiis et al, Proteins 2008 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_bronze.png) ![Top 1% (2nd/2932) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (4th/2466) contribution to Sadiq et al, Proteins 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (14th/3118) contribution to Selent et al, PLoS Comput Biol 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (83rd/9662) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (38th/5798) contribution to Sadiq et al, PNAS 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (22nd/3349) contribution to Buch et al, JCIM 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (171st/3864) contribution to Dainese et al, Biochem. J. 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (14th/2163) contribution to Bisignano et al. JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 25% (525th/2838) contribution to Stanley et al, Nat Commun 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 1% (10th/3183) contribution to Lauro et al., JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 75% (4546th/6232) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, JCIM 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) |
On your current last 2 result pages I see 9 errors which occurred while running on the GTX 260 (usually Cuda device 3), whereas only one complete and one partial WU were crunched successfully by this card. The remaining errors are related to the oversize WUs, so none to assign to the other cards.
That doesn't have to mean it's broken.. I'd check it on a different PC, preferably with less other GPUs. could also be that the 2D settings are somehow messed up, e.g. voltage or fan speed too low due to whatever reason.
MrS
That's what I was just about to do ETA, pull the 260 from the i7 and swap it into another Computer & put the Card from the other Computer into the i7. That way if I keep getting the errors on the i7 it probably just don't want to run the Wu's properly in the 3'rd Slot I guess for some reason.
Also I'll get to see if the Box I put the 260 into start to get Error's or not. |
|
|
STE\/ESend message
Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 368 Credit: 4,173,502,885 RAC: 268,909 Level
![Arginine - More than 3B credits Arg](img/badges/aa/badge_arg.png) Scientific publications
![Top 90% (223rd/251) contribution to De Fabritiis et al, Proteins 2008 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_bronze.png) ![Top 1% (2nd/2932) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (4th/2466) contribution to Sadiq et al, Proteins 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (14th/3118) contribution to Selent et al, PLoS Comput Biol 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (83rd/9662) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (38th/5798) contribution to Sadiq et al, PNAS 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (22nd/3349) contribution to Buch et al, JCIM 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (171st/3864) contribution to Dainese et al, Biochem. J. 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (14th/2163) contribution to Bisignano et al. JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 25% (525th/2838) contribution to Stanley et al, Nat Commun 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 1% (10th/3183) contribution to Lauro et al., JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 75% (4546th/6232) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, JCIM 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) |
I'm switching the cards now, had some other stuff to do first to the Box the 260 was going in. Since it was going to be down a little I figured I'd do that first. Putting a GTX 295 in the Slot the 260 was in to see if that starts getting errors in that Slot.
But how can you tell the 260 was the one that erred, is it because it's the last card listed or because of the following Message with it showing Error & Warnings:
# Device 3: "GeForce GTX 260"
# Clock rate: 799200 kilohertz
# Total amount of global memory: 939261952 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 27
# Number of cores: 216
# Amber: readparm : Reading parm file parameters
# PARM file in AMBER 7 format
# Encounter 10-12 H-bond term
WARNING: parameters.cu, line 568: Found zero 10-12 H-bond term.
WARNING: parameters.cu, line 568: Found zero 10-12 H-bond term.
MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor"
Cuda error: Kernel [fft_data_swizzle_in] failed in file 'c:\cygwin\home\speechserver\gpumd2\src\pme\CPME_cufft.cu' in line 44 : the launch timed out and was terminated. |
|
|
|
But how can you tell the 260 was the one that erred
Simply look at the erroneous task and look for the line that says "# Using CUDA device X"
Bob |
|
|
STE\/ESend message
Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 368 Credit: 4,173,502,885 RAC: 268,909 Level
![Arginine - More than 3B credits Arg](img/badges/aa/badge_arg.png) Scientific publications
![Top 90% (223rd/251) contribution to De Fabritiis et al, Proteins 2008 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_bronze.png) ![Top 1% (2nd/2932) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (4th/2466) contribution to Sadiq et al, Proteins 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (14th/3118) contribution to Selent et al, PLoS Comput Biol 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (83rd/9662) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (38th/5798) contribution to Sadiq et al, PNAS 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (22nd/3349) contribution to Buch et al, JCIM 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (171st/3864) contribution to Dainese et al, Biochem. J. 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (14th/2163) contribution to Bisignano et al. JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 25% (525th/2838) contribution to Stanley et al, Nat Commun 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 1% (10th/3183) contribution to Lauro et al., JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 75% (4546th/6232) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, JCIM 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) |
But how can you tell the 260 was the one that erred
Simply look at the erroneous task and look for the line that says "# Using CUDA device X"
Bob
Okay, Thanks Bob .. |
|
|
STE\/ESend message
Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 368 Credit: 4,173,502,885 RAC: 268,909 Level
![Arginine - More than 3B credits Arg](img/badges/aa/badge_arg.png) Scientific publications
![Top 90% (223rd/251) contribution to De Fabritiis et al, Proteins 2008 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_bronze.png) ![Top 1% (2nd/2932) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (4th/2466) contribution to Sadiq et al, Proteins 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (14th/3118) contribution to Selent et al, PLoS Comput Biol 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (83rd/9662) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (38th/5798) contribution to Sadiq et al, PNAS 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (22nd/3349) contribution to Buch et al, JCIM 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (171st/3864) contribution to Dainese et al, Biochem. J. 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (14th/2163) contribution to Bisignano et al. JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 25% (525th/2838) contribution to Stanley et al, Nat Commun 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 1% (10th/3183) contribution to Lauro et al., JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 75% (4546th/6232) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, JCIM 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) |
Looks like the GTX 260 could be bad, it already erred out 1 Wu in it's new Box while the i7 it came out of hasn't had an error since I pulled the 260 out of it.
I think i'll switch the Box to running AQUA CUDA Wu's & see if it gets error's on them too while I get ahold of BFG & see if they'll RMA it. Supposed to have a Lifetime Warranty so I hope they will. |
|
|
|
What's its clock speed in the other system? Well, might be time for RMA anyway.
MrS
____________
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
|
|
STE\/ESend message
Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 368 Credit: 4,173,502,885 RAC: 268,909 Level
![Arginine - More than 3B credits Arg](img/badges/aa/badge_arg.png) Scientific publications
![Top 90% (223rd/251) contribution to De Fabritiis et al, Proteins 2008 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_bronze.png) ![Top 1% (2nd/2932) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (4th/2466) contribution to Sadiq et al, Proteins 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (14th/3118) contribution to Selent et al, PLoS Comput Biol 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (83rd/9662) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (38th/5798) contribution to Sadiq et al, PNAS 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (22nd/3349) contribution to Buch et al, JCIM 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (171st/3864) contribution to Dainese et al, Biochem. J. 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (14th/2163) contribution to Bisignano et al. JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 25% (525th/2838) contribution to Stanley et al, Nat Commun 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 1% (10th/3183) contribution to Lauro et al., JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 75% (4546th/6232) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, JCIM 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) |
BFG is willing to do a Warranty Replacement, so I may as well go that way. The 260 is an OCX so it came pretty well overclocked right from the Factory. But it's not Overclocked any higher than any of the other BFG Cards I have and their running the Wu's ok. Hopefully this isn't a sign of things to come from running the Cards 24/7 since I've had them. |
|
|
STE\/ESend message
Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 368 Credit: 4,173,502,885 RAC: 268,909 Level
![Arginine - More than 3B credits Arg](img/badges/aa/badge_arg.png) Scientific publications
![Top 90% (223rd/251) contribution to De Fabritiis et al, Proteins 2008 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_bronze.png) ![Top 1% (2nd/2932) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (4th/2466) contribution to Sadiq et al, Proteins 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (14th/3118) contribution to Selent et al, PLoS Comput Biol 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (83rd/9662) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (38th/5798) contribution to Sadiq et al, PNAS 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (22nd/3349) contribution to Buch et al, JCIM 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (171st/3864) contribution to Dainese et al, Biochem. J. 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (14th/2163) contribution to Bisignano et al. JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 25% (525th/2838) contribution to Stanley et al, Nat Commun 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 1% (10th/3183) contribution to Lauro et al., JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 75% (4546th/6232) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, JCIM 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) |
My i7 on Steroids, no Error's so far with this setup. I did RMA the GTX 260 & should have the new Card by the end of the week ... :)
stderr out <core_client_version>6.5.0</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
# Using CUDA device 0
# Device 0: "GeForce GTX 295"
# Clock rate: 1512000 kilohertz
# Total amount of global memory: 939261952 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 30
# Number of cores: 240
# Device 1: "GeForce GTX 295"
# Clock rate: 1512000 kilohertz
# Total amount of global memory: 939196416 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 30
# Number of cores: 240
# Device 2: "GeForce GTX 295"
# Clock rate: 1512000 kilohertz
# Total amount of global memory: 939261952 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 30
# Number of cores: 240
# Device 3: "GeForce GTX 295"
# Clock rate: 1512000 kilohertz
# Total amount of global memory: 939261952 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 30
# Number of cores: 240
# Device 4: "GeForce GTX 295"
# Clock rate: 1512000 kilohertz
# Total amount of global memory: 939261952 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 30
# Number of cores: 240
# Device 5: "GeForce GTX 295"
# Clock rate: 1512000 kilohertz
# Total amount of global memory: 939261952 bytes
# Number of multiprocessors: 30
# Number of cores: 240
MDIO ERROR: cannot open file "restart.coor"
# Time per step: 37.299 ms
# Approximate elapsed time for entire WU: 23311.734 s
called boinc_finish |
|
|
GDFVolunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07 Posts: 1957 Credit: 629,356 RAC: 0 Level
![Glycine - More than 500K credits Gly](img/badges/aa/badge_gly.png) Scientific publications
![Top 25% (36th/251) contribution to De Fabritiis et al, Proteins 2008 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 90% (2269th/2932) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_bronze.png) ![Top 50% (1221st/2450) contribution to Giorgino et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_gold.png) ![Top 75% (5903rd/9662) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) ![Top 90% (5079th/5798) contribution to Sadiq et al, PNAS 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_bronze.png) |
Sorry if I ask but what is this? How can you have some many 295 on the same host?
gdf |
|
|
STE\/ESend message
Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 368 Credit: 4,173,502,885 RAC: 268,909 Level
![Arginine - More than 3B credits Arg](img/badges/aa/badge_arg.png) Scientific publications
![Top 90% (223rd/251) contribution to De Fabritiis et al, Proteins 2008 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_bronze.png) ![Top 1% (2nd/2932) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (4th/2466) contribution to Sadiq et al, Proteins 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (14th/3118) contribution to Selent et al, PLoS Comput Biol 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (83rd/9662) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (38th/5798) contribution to Sadiq et al, PNAS 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (22nd/3349) contribution to Buch et al, JCIM 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (171st/3864) contribution to Dainese et al, Biochem. J. 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (14th/2163) contribution to Bisignano et al. JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 25% (525th/2838) contribution to Stanley et al, Nat Commun 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 1% (10th/3183) contribution to Lauro et al., JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 75% (4546th/6232) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, JCIM 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) |
Sorry if I ask but what is this? How can you have some many 295 on the same host?
gdf
Um, Errrr, running 3 GTX 295's on it will do the Trick every time ... ;) ... On a Gigabyte Extreme X58 Mother Board, just popped 3 of them in there and it was off and running without any tinkering.
Only running 2 right now as the Backup couldn't handle it and kept shutting the PC off, and plugging it in directly to the outlet the PC would shut off every time the Central Air came on so I went back to 2 295's for now until I can get a bigger Backup Power Supply. |
|
|
|
The 295 counts as one card, but as 2 CUDA devices. Seems confusing but correct :D
MrS
____________
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002 |
|
|
STE\/ESend message
Joined: 18 Sep 08 Posts: 368 Credit: 4,173,502,885 RAC: 268,909 Level
![Arginine - More than 3B credits Arg](img/badges/aa/badge_arg.png) Scientific publications
![Top 90% (223rd/251) contribution to De Fabritiis et al, Proteins 2008 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_bronze.png) ![Top 1% (2nd/2932) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (4th/2466) contribution to Sadiq et al, Proteins 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (14th/3118) contribution to Selent et al, PLoS Comput Biol 2010 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (83rd/9662) contribution to Buch et al, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (38th/5798) contribution to Sadiq et al, PNAS 2012 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 1% (22nd/3349) contribution to Buch et al, JCIM 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 10% (171st/3864) contribution to Dainese et al, Biochem. J. 2013 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_emerald.png) ![Top 1% (14th/2163) contribution to Bisignano et al. JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 25% (525th/2838) contribution to Stanley et al, Nat Commun 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_ruby.png) ![Top 1% (10th/3183) contribution to Lauro et al., JCIM 2014 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_sapphire.png) ![Top 75% (4546th/6232) contribution to Herrera-Nieto et al, JCIM 2020 wat](img/badges/papers/badge_pub_silver.png) |
Another Host of mine showing 3 GTX 280's when in actuality it's 1 GTX 295 & 1 GTX 280 ... Weird:
6/24/2009 7:05:42 PM CUDA device: GeForce GTX 280 (driver version 18618, compute capability 1.3, 1024MB, est. 130GFLOPS)
6/24/2009 7:05:42 PM CUDA device: GeForce GTX 280 (driver version 18618, compute capability 1.3, 1024MB, est. 130GFLOPS)
6/24/2009 7:05:42 PM CUDA device: GeForce GTX 280 (driver version 18618, compute capability 1.3, 1024MB, est. 130GFLOPS) |
|
|